MoneyGym
MoneyGym/Spending & saving/Money Personality

Money Personality

Section: SpendingDifficulty: StarterRound length: Under 3 minFreeNo sign-up
Preparing your game…

Complete game guide

A three-minute spending diagnosis. Twelve scenarios cover four kinds of leak — working out which way of buying is cheaper, limited-time prices that are not lower, subscriptions that keep renewing, and the size of an emergency-fund gap — and the result names the one this round leaked most on. Nothing is self-reported: every question has one answer that the arithmetic settles, and every price is invented for the question and printed inside it.

The goal

Money Personality deals twelve spending scenarios, three from each of four categories, interleaved so you never know which one you are being asked about. Every question shows four ways of paying for the same thing and asks which lands lowest on one stated basis: unit price paid, total paid, spend across a year, or the gap still to cover. Exactly one option wins, and it wins by at least a yuan and at least one percent, so nothing turns on small change. The four categories are the four leaks the result can name: deals, snap buys, renewals and buffer. A round takes about three minutes.

Controls and play

Tap an option, or press the number beside it — 1 to 4. A right answer flashes and moves on by itself after a moment. A wrong answer, or a question the clock runs out on, stops and shows the correct option with one line of why, and only your press moves it on from there: the explanation is what the mistake bought you, so nothing takes it away on a timer. Each question has its own fifteen seconds, shown as a ring that turns urgent under five.

Points and streaks

A right answer scores 100 points times a streak multiplier, and a harder question is worth 30% more. The multiplier climbs one rung every three answers in a row and tops out at 2.5 — a twelve-question round cannot reach a higher rung, so no higher one is advertised. A wrong answer and a timeout both score nothing and break the streak; neither takes points away. Because a perfect round scores differently depending on where the harder questions land in the streak, the result page also shows a comparison index from 0 to 1000, which is weighted accuracy and does not move with question order.

Finishing and results

The round ends after the twelfth question. The result names where this round leaked most, and shows each category as misses over questions actually answered, plus how many timed out. Two rules decide the label: a timeout is not a leak, because what it carries is reading speed rather than a spending judgement, and no label is issued at all unless all four categories were answered at least twice. If one category was left under-measured the result says so and offers another round, rather than guessing from the other three. At most one miss in twelve reads as no real leak.

Replay and progress

With no deal link in the address bar every round is dealt fresh: eight candidate deals are laid out and the one repeating the fewest of the questions you just answered is the one you play. That makes a repeat unlikely rather than impossible, and when every candidate overlaps, the smallest overlap still wins. Your best score stays in this browser and nothing is uploaded — this game collects no financial figures about you at all, and the share text says only what the result card already showed you: the label, the grade, the score, the index, the four leak counts, how many questions ran out of time, and the deal link. Opening a shared deal link plays exactly the same twelve questions in the same order with the same option order, including in the other language.

Language and context

English and Chinese are written separately rather than translated, and the two banks line up question for question: the same twelve ids, the same difficulty, the same correct slot, and the same underlying arithmetic. Only the wording differs, and it differs where the languages differ — a discount written as 8 折 in Chinese is written as 20% off in English, which is the same fact in both. Every price is invented for its own question and stated inside it, so no question depends on one country's prices, taxes or credit rules.

This round covers

Unit price is the only way to compare different pack sizes

Four items for 21 each plus 12 shipping is 24 a piece; one item at 28 with free shipping is 28. The bigger basket is not automatically cheaper, and the smaller one is not automatically dearer.

Source: Worked from figures stated in the question

Half off the second item is a quarter off the pair

Two at 39 with the second halved is 58.50, or 29.25 each. Set against a flat 20% off it wins; set against a coupon it may not.

Source: Worked from figures stated in the question

A coupon that fires once is not a coupon that repeats

Spend 120 against a rail that takes 8 off every 50 and it fires twice; the same 120 against a single 13-off coupon fires once. Same basket, different rule, different answer.

Source: Worked from figures stated in the question

A limited-time price is a price, not a saving

A flash 39 plus 8 shipping lands at 47; an everyday 45 with a tenth off lands at 40.50. Whether the label says limited has no bearing on which number is smaller.

Source: Worked from figures stated in the question

Padding a basket to reach free shipping lowers the unit price and raises the bill

Three at 24 plus 10 shipping is 82, or 27.33 each; four at 24 shipped free is 96, or 24 each. The cheaper item is the dearer total, so the answer turns on whether you wanted the fourth.

Source: Worked from figures stated in the question

A free trial is priced by when you cancel, not by the trial

At 29 a month with one month free, cancelling inside the free month costs nothing and leaving it running costs 319 across the year. The decision is a date, and it is the whole cost.

Source: Worked from figures stated in the question

An emergency-fund gap is months of spending minus what is saved, floored at zero

Three months at 4800 is 14400; against 9000 already saved the gap is 5400. If what is saved already covers it the gap is zero, never a negative number.

Source: Worked from figures stated in the question

An instalment fee is a rate times the months, and it compounds nothing

3600 over twelve months at 0.6% a month adds 259.20; the same 3600 over three fee-free months adds nothing. Spreading a payment has a price and it is printed.

Source: Worked from figures stated in the question

Questions people ask

What is Money Personality?

Money Personality is a free browser game that deals twelve everyday spending scenarios — four ways of paying for the same thing, one of which is genuinely cheapest — and tells you which kind of scenario you got wrong most. A round takes about three minutes, needs no account, and nothing you do is uploaded.

Is this a personality test?

No, and it is built so it cannot be. Nothing here is self-reported: there is no scale to rate yourself on and no question without a right answer. Every scenario reduces four options to one number on one stated basis, and the answer is whichever number is lowest — computed by the code, not chosen by whoever wrote the question. The label at the end names the category this round's mistakes fell into. It describes a round, not a person, and every line on the result page is written that way.

Does it tell me how many people get these wrong?

No, and it never will. There is no published error rate this bank could honestly cite for scenarios written specifically for it, so no page in this game claims one. You will not find a sentence here saying what share of shoppers do anything, because that figure does not exist for these questions and inventing it would be worse than leaving it out.

Why did I get 'needs another round' instead of a result?

Because one of the four categories was answered fewer than twice — usually because those questions timed out. The category nobody reached may well be the one that leaks most, so calling a result from the other three would be pretending to know something the round did not measure. The honest answer is that there is not enough to go on, and another round fixes it.

Do questions I run out of time on count against me?

They cost you the streak and the points, exactly like a wrong answer, but they do not shape the result. What a timeout carries is reading speed and interruption, not a spending judgement, so counting it as a leak would hand a slow reader a result that is not theirs. The leak bars show timeouts as striped cells so you can see which ones did not count, and the result page repeats the rule underneath.

Are the prices real?

No, and every question says so on screen. Each figure is invented for the scenario it appears in and is stated inside that scenario, so you never need to know what anything actually costs to answer. Under each prompt is a note naming the basis the question is computed on, the year, and the fact that the price is a worked example rather than a quote. That note is the only place a year appears: any question whose prompt, options or explanation held a number reading as one would be rejected before it reached you.

Why does the page show an index as well as a score?

Because the raw score depends on where the harder questions landed in your streak, so two people with identical answers can score differently. The index is weighted accuracy on a 0–1000 scale and does not move with question order, which makes it the only number worth comparing. The score is still shown; it just describes this round rather than ranking it.

Can I send someone the same twelve questions?

Yes. The share text carries a deal link, and opening it deals exactly the same twelve questions, in the same order, with the same option order. It works across languages too, because the English and Chinese banks hold the same twelve ids with the same correct slots. Pressing play again drops the link and deals a fresh round.

Play next

Spending & saving